Classification
 Nomenclature
Scientific Name:
Distichophyllum Dozy & Molk., Musci Frond. Ined. Archip. Ind. 99 (1846)
Synonymy:
  • = Mniadelphus Müll.Hal., Linnaea 21: 196 (1848) nom. illeg.
Etymology:
The generic name alludes to the seemingly 2-rowed (actually mostly 6-rowed and strongly complanate) arrangement of the leaves in many of the species (Greek distichos & phyllon).
 Description

Plants small to robust, soft, iridescent or not, usually complanate, mostly terrestrial and often forming layered mats. Stems erect or prostrate, sparsely branched, in cross-section lacking a hyalodermis, lacking distinct cortical layers, and lacking a central strand, sparsely beset below with brown to red-brown, ± smooth rhizoids. Shoots mostly complanate, but sometimes nearly terete. Leaves in 6–8 ranks, widely or closely spaced, mostly symmetric, oval, elliptic, or obovate, apiculate or rounded at apices, mostly plane, entire, bordered or occasionally unbordered (as in D. microcarpum), those of ventral and dorsal ranks smaller than those of lateral ranks; upper laminal cells smooth, firm-walled, ± hexagonal, compact, becoming larger and laxer towards the base, occasionally inflated and pale adjacent to the lower costa; alar cells not differentiated. Costa single, narrow, often forked in upper portions, usually ending well below the leaf apex.

Autoicous, dioicous, or rarely synoicous. Perichaetial leaves with weak border and costa ± absent. Perigonia lateral on stems, gemmiform, bracts with weak border and costa ± absent. Setae lateral or ventral (as in D. microcarpum), erect, smooth or papillose, mostly red-brown; capsules horizontal, pendent, or occasionally nearly erect, symmetric, oblong-cylindric from a tapered neck, smooth or tuberculate; exothecial cells collenchymatous, rarely (in D. microcarpum) with arching secondary thickenings converging over the lumen; annulus narrow and falling with the operculum or absent; operculum long-rostrate from a conic base. Peristome double; exostome teeth yellow to brown-yellow, linear-lanceolate, furrowed, densely and finely cross-striate, with high lamellae on inner surface that project laterally to form marginal trabeculae; endostome pale yellow, finely papillose, with a moderate to high basal membrane; endostome segments usually well-developed and usually ± perforate; cilia rudimentary or absent. Calyptra mitrate-rostrate, often hairy, fimbriate at base. Spores small.

 Taxonomy

A large genus with up to 100 species, distributed mostly in Malesia and Oceania, but with a secondary centre in the cool-temperate regions of the southern hemisphere. Many of the described species are recorded from a single island or land mass. The palaeotropical species are often difficult to distinguish with confidence and the genus needs a large-scale taxonomic revision; it is likely that this would result in drastic reduction of the number of recognised species. Four species occur in N.Z., one with two varieties. The N.Z. species are somewhat anomalous in the genus in that all are dioicous with the exception of the autoicous D. crispulum var. adnatum. In the intra-generic classification of Brotherus (1925, p. 227) all but one of the N.Z. species (D. microcarpum) are placed in the section Discophyllum. While a firm case could be mounted on morphological grounds (discussed under that species) for the segregation of D. microcarpum, this is not advocated here.

Streimann (1999) presented a revision of seven species occurring in Australia that is useful in N.Z. Matteri's (1975) earlier monograph of Andean/Patagonian Hookeriaceae also included useful information on this genus, but her species concepts are narrower than those applied here and there is only modest species overlap with N.Z.

The genus Distichophyllum was based by Dozy & Molkenboer (1845–1854) on three species, of which two (D. cuspidatum and D. spathulatum, both from Java) were retained in the genus by Brotherus (1925). One of these two species should be selected as the generitype.

 Key

In the following key and descriptions, the phrase "upper laminal cells" refers to cells midway between the termination of the costa and the leaf margin.

1Vegetative leaves rounded at apex and with or without a small apical apiculus, mostly spathulate but sometimes elliptic2
1'Vegetative leaves acute and clearly apiculate at apex, never spathulate, mostly elliptic (often broadly so)3
2Plants not iridescent, often with brown secondary pigments; juxtacostal laminal cells enlarged and lax to form an ill-defined group extending c. ⅔ the length of the costa (usually visible under the hand-lens); marginal cells neither elongate, nor forming a distinct border; perichaetial leaves acute; capsules c. 1.0 mm long; exothecial cells collenchymatous and with several cylindrical secondary wall thickenings converging over the lumen to form a ribbed vault-like structureD. microcarpum
2'Plants mostly iridescent, usually yellow-green but often with red secondary pigmentation in some or all of the leaf or sometimes nearly black; juxtacostal laminal cells in lower leaf not strongly differentiated; marginal cells elongate in several rows and forming a distinct border; perichaetial leaves obtuse or rounded; capsules mostly 1.2–1.8 mm long; exothecial cells collenchymatous but lacking a ribbed vault-like structure of secondary wall thickeningsD. pulchellum
3Leaves mostly denticulate in upper half or more, occasionally entire, stoutly bordered, 0.7–1.0(–1.3) × 0.3–0.5(–0.6) mm; shoots 1–2 mm wide D. rotundifolium
3'Leaves entire, stoutly or narrowly bordered, 1.0–2.3 × 0.5–0.8 mm; shoots c. 3 mm wide 4
4Dioicous; leaves strongly crisped when dry, obscuring the complanate nature of the shoots, 1.0–1.5(–1.8) mm long; border stout, usually 18–30 µm wide at mid leaf; upper laminal cells 9–15(–20) × 9–12 µmD. crispulum var. crispulum
4'Autoicous; leaves weakly to moderately crisped when dry, not obscuring the complanate nature of the shoots, 1.4–2.3 mm long; border narrow, 6–12(–15) µm wide at mid leaf; upper laminal cells 18–24(–30) × 12–18 µm, often smaller in several rows near marginD. crispulum var. adnatum
 Biostatus
Indigenous (Non-endemic)
Number of species in New Zealand within Distichophyllum Dozy & Molk.
CategoryNumber
Indigenous (Non-endemic)4
Total4
 Excluded Taxa

Distichophyllum aloma Müll.Hal. (1902) was tentatively placed in synonymy in 1907 with D. microcarpum by Brotherus (1901–1909, p. 930). The type specimen (T. Kirk 502 from "Ligars Gulley", Auckland) has not been seen, but is likely in the Stephani herbarium at Geneva.

Hookeria amoena Colenso (1886) and H. smaragdina Colenso (1886) are discussed briefly under D. rotundifolium.

Hookeria cataractae Colenso (1887) and H. concinna Colenso nom. illeg. (1886) were both placed by Dixon (1927, p. 282) as synonyms of what is termed here D. crispulum var. adnatum. Colenso’s type locality (near Norsewood, Wellington L.D.) for both these names is far south of the known distribution of the var. adnatum. Therefore Dixon’s synonymies are questionable. However, in the absence of type material, these names are not further discussed here.

Hookeria flexuosa Mitt. in Hooker (1867) and H. subsinuata Colenso (1886) were both tentatively placed by Dixon (1927, p. 282) in synonymy with the taxon treated here as D. crispulum var. crispulum. It is unlikely that Dixon saw type material for these names and their type localities are far south of the confirmed distribution of the var. crispulum. Therefore Dixon’s synonymies are questionable, and these names are not further discussed here.

Hookeria microclada Colenso (1886) and Distichophyllum zuernii Schlieph. in Müll.Hal. (1902) are both discussed briefly under Distichophyllum pulchellum.

 Bibliography
Brotherus, V.F. 1901–1909: Musci (Laubmoose) II Specieller Teil. In: Engler, A.; Prantl, K. (ed.) Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Teil 1. Abt. 3. Engelmann, Leipzig. 277–1246.
Brotherus, V.F. 1925: Musci (Laubmoose). In: Engler, A. (ed.) Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Edition 2. Bd 11. Engelmann, Leipzig. 1–542.
Dixon, H.N. 1927: Studies in the bryology of New Zealand, with special reference to the herbarium of Robert Brown. Part V. Bulletin, New Zealand Institute 3(5): 239–298.
Dozy, F.; Molkenboer, J.H. 1845–1854: Musci Frondosi Inediti Archipelagi Indici: sive descriptio et adumbratio muscorum frondosorum in insulis Java, Borneo, Sumatra, Celebes, Amboina nec non in Japonia nuper detectorum minusve cognitorum. Hazenberg, Leiden.
Fife, A.J. 2017: Daltoniaceae. In: Breitwieser, I.; Wilton, A.D. (ed.) Flora of New Zealand – Mosses. Fascicle 34. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln.
Goffinet, B.; Buck, W.R.; Shaw, A.J. 2009: Morphology, anatomy, and classification of the Bryophyta. In: Goffinet, B.; Shaw, A.J. (ed.) Bryophyte Biology. Edition 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 55–138.
Matteri, C.M. 1975: Las Hookeriaceae (Musci) Andino-Patagonicas, I. Nova Hedwigia 26: 649–724.
Müller, C. 1848: Plantae Kegelianae Surinamenses. Musci frondosi. Linnaea 21: 181–200.
Streimann, H. 1999: Taxonomic studies on Australian Hookeriaceae (Musci) 2. The genera Distichophyllum and Bryobrothera. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 86: 89–119.
Vitt, D.H. 1984: Classification of the Bryospida. In: Schuster, R.M. New Manual of Bryology. Hattori Botanical Laboratory, Nichinan. 696–759.