Classification
 Nomenclature
Scientific Name:
Pyrrhobryum mnioides (Hook.) Manuel, Cryptog. Bryol. Lichénol. 1: 70 (1980)
Synonymy:
  • Hypnum mnioides Hook., Musci Exot. 1, 77 (1818)
  • Rhizogonium mnioides (Hook.) Hook.f. & Wilson in Wilson, Bot. Antarct. Voy. II (Fl. Nov.-Zel.) Part II, 116 (1854)
  • Hymenodontopsis mnioides (Hook.) N.E.Bell, A.E.Newton & D.Quandt, Bryologist 110: 555 (2007)
Holotype: Argentina, “Staten Island prope Cape Horn,” A. Menzies, 1787, BM-Hooker!
Etymology:
The species epithet alludes to a resemblance to members of the genus Mnium, typified by the widespread M. hornum Hedw.
 Biostatus
Indigenous (Non-endemic)
Number of subspecific taxa in New Zealand within Pyrrhobryum mnioides (Hook.) Manuel
CategoryNumber
Indigenous (Non-endemic)1
Total1
 Notes

South American populations of P. mnioides have longer (3.8–7.2 mm) and broader (0.7–1.0 mm) leaves than Australasian populations. There is also a strong tendency for leaves in South American material to be less concave and less crisped when dry, for the leaves on the lower stems to be reduced, and for the stems to be less densely covered with rhizoids. The differences in leaf dimensions are the most consistent differences; collectively, the differences result in a quite marked difference in habit between South American and Australasian populations. A small fraction of South American specimens have dry leaves contorted in a manner suggestive of Australasian specimens, but in all such material the leaf dimensions are consistently larger. Perichaetia in both South American and Australasian material are borne in vegetative leaf axils. The morphologic differences and isolation of the two entities dictate the recognition of the Australasian material at the subspecific rank. The interpretation of South American and Australasian populations as distinct subspecies is broadly supported by molecular studies published by McDaniel & Shaw (2003).

 Bibliography
Bell, N.E.; Quandt, D.; O'Brien, T.J.; Newton, A.E. 2007: Taxonomy and phylogeny in the earliest diverging pleurocarps: square holes and bifurcating pegs. Bryologist 110: 533–560.
Fife, A.J. 2016: Rhizogoniaceae. In: Heenan, P.B.; Breitwieser, I.; Wilton, A.D. (ed.) Flora of New Zealand — Mosses. Fascicle 26. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln.
Hooker, W.J. 1818: Musci Exotici, containing Figures and Descriptions of new or little known foreign mosses and other cryptogamic subjects. Vol. 1. Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme and Brown, London.
Manuel, G. 1980: Miscellanea bryologica II. Classification of Rhizogonium Brid. Penzigiella hookeri Gangulee, and some nomina nuda. Cryptogamie - Bryologie et Lichénologie 1: 67–72.
McDaniel, S.R.; Shaw, A.J. 2003: Phylogeographic structure and cryptic speciation in the trans-Antarctic moss Pyrrhobryum mnioides. Evolution 57: 205–215.
Wilson, W. 1854 ("1855"): Musci. In: Hooker, J.D. The Botany of the Antarctic Voyage of H.M. Discovery Ships Erebus and Terror, in the years 1839–1843, under the command of Captain Sir James Clark Ross. II. Flora Novae-Zelandiae. Part II. Flowerless plants. Lovell Reeve, London. 57–125.