- ≡ Amblystegium subgen. Leptodictyum Schimp. (1860)
Regionally, Leptodictyum is distinguished from Amblystegium primarily by its longer laminal cells. Buck (1998, p. 210) characterised it by having "soft or flaccid plants typically with distantly spaced, wide-spreading leaves. The single costa mostly extends about ⅔ the leaf length, and the leaf cells are relatively long. The alar cells are only poorly, if at all, differentiated". As characterised here, the genus is monotypic and no separate generic description is provided. Its treatment as monotypic agrees with the interpretation of Hedenäs (2003).
Category | Number |
---|---|
Indigenous (Non-endemic) | 1 |
Total | 1 |
Leptodictyum humile (P.Beauv.) H.A.Crum has been applied by R. Ochyra to three specimens in AK. One of these collections, AK 186609, is a mixture of several species including what appears to be Campyliadelphus polygamus. The other two collections (AK 188160, 186607) do not differ significantly from other N.Z. populations of L. riparium; they have upper laminal cells with l:w ratios c. 7–8:1. I see no merit in Ochyra’s determination of this material as L. humile, a species otherwise not recorded from N.Z. The question of the status of L. humile in other parts of the world is beyond the scope of this discussion.